Sunday, February 19, 2017

Ο Edward Snowden υπαινίσσεται ότι η NSA βρίσκει δυνατή τη πρόσβαση στις «Σκέψεις και τα συναισθήματα» σας.

Edward Snowden

Ο Edward Snowden υπαινίσσεται ότι η NSA βρίσκει δυνατή τη πρόσβαση στις «Σκέψεις και τα συναισθήματα» σας.

Edward Snowden Hints That the NSA Can Access Your ‘Thoughts & Feelings’
Anon News | Arjun Walia
As most of you know, Edward Snowden is the former intelligence contractor who leaked the NSA’s mass surveillance program and discovered some of the most solid evidence for the existence of clandestine black budget operations.
But did we really need the leak in order to believe this? Prior to his leaks, the issue was still considered a conspiracy theory by many, despite the fact that there was still good evidence for these programs prior to Snowden’s revelations.
 The United States has a history of government agencies existing in secret for years. The NSA (National Security Agency) was founded in 1952, but its existence was hidden until the mid 1960s.
Even more secretive is the National Reconnaissance Office, which was founded in 1960 but remained completely secret for 30 years.
Today, there are still a number of issues that hold the stigma of ‘conspiracy theory,’ despite the fact that we have some very credible sources that have revealed some intriguing facts, and one of these issues falls into the realm of parapsychology, the study of phenomena ranging from mental telepathy, clairvoyance, to psychokinesis, remote viewing, and much more.

 Just imagine how useful those things would be to ‘spy’ on people? No doubt a great asset to the surveillance state if they are indeed real, which in my opinion, a lot of evidence suggests they are.
A classic example comes from the U.S. government’s ‘Stargate‘ program, which lasted more than 20 years. The program was actually declassified about a decade ago and the results were published in the journal Scientific Exploration.
The program studied various uses for parapsychology and extended human capacities, like telepathy, but was terminated despite the fact that it was very successful with little to know explanation. The program was run by intelligence agencies, like the CIA and NSA, in conjunction with the Stanford Research Institute (SRI).
So, as you can see, this is not strange territory for intelligence agencies.

 In fact, in 1976, before this program commenced, a presentation was given at the Institute of Electrical & Electronics (IEEE) on a paper published by the institute on behalf of Doctors Hal Puthoff and Russell Targ, two of the main scientists involved with project Stargate. (See related article “Cancelled TED talk: Physicist contracted by CIA shares everything he knows about ESP“).

Even in 1975, the funding clients had agreed that this subtle perception channel existed in both experienced and inexperienced individuals. (Source, a lecture from Ingo Swann, one of 500 highly skilled participants within the program).
The paper was titled “A Perceptual Channel For Information Transfer Over Kilometer Distances: Historical Perspectives and Recent Research.” It presented scientific evidence for the existence of a perceptual capacity channel whereby certain individuals are able to perceive and describe remote data not perceivable to any known sense.
A CIA document titled “Chronology of Recent Interest in Exceptional Functions of The Human Body in the People’s Republic of China” is also another great example of their interest. In the document, it outlines the Chinese government’s interest in parapsychology (remote viewing, telepathy, psychokinesis, etc.).
Here is another one titled “Research into Paranormal Ability To Break Through Spatial Barriers”  that touches upon the same thing. This is elaborated on later in the article.
This particular document, which was declassified through a Freedom of Information Act request (FOIA), outlines specific people with very special abilities and how they’ve been studied by thousands of scientists and governments around the world for a very long time.
The document is on the CIA website, but only seems to be accessible from the Internet Archives, a San Francisco–based nonprofit digital library with the stated mission of “universal access to all knowledge.”
These facts were also outlined in a declassified U.S. Air Force report on teleportation, which was made available through the Federation of American Scientists.
On October 31st 2016, Edward Snowden retweeted a tweet from NYT Minus Context that said, “Remember that people don’t have access to your secret thoughts and feelings.” His tweet was a response to massive global surveillance, and the fact that nobody really has any privacy anymore. NWY Minus Context was trying to remind people that not everything can be under the watchful eye of the NSA.

Η Μέρκελ θέλει περισσότερους Πρόσφυγες.

 Η Μέρκελ Ισχυρίζεται πως το Ισλάμ "δεν είναι η αιτία της τρομοκρατίας» και θέλει περισσότερους Πρόσφυγες.

BREAKING : Merkel Claims Islam “Is Not the Cause of Terrorism,” Wants MORE Refugees

If there is anyone as clueless and delusional as German leader, Angela Merkel? We think not.
After decimating German culture and turning it into a hotbed of violence by foolishly taking in a million poorly vetted islamic refugees, Merkel’s political party has fallen apart and she is floundering in her re-election polls where she has fallen behind.
Now she is acting righteous about her incredibly dangerous open doors policy that has led to widespread rape and sexual assault. TRULY SADISTIC.
From DailyStar
The embattled leader says Europe has an obligation to take displaced people from Syria and Iraq.
She also said Islam “is not the cause of terrorism” and that combatting extremism needs the cooperation of Muslim Countries.
In a wide-ranging speech at a Munich security conference, the German chief also vowed to work closely with Vladimir Putin’s Russia in the fight with ISIS in the Middle East.
Mrs Merkel has come under fire for taking in up to one million refugees amid security concerns and a string of migrant sex attacks across Germany.
After the Berlin lorry attack at a Christmas market in December, ex-UKIP leader Nigel Farage said events such as that will be “Merkel’s legacy”.
Mrs , saying she had “deep regrets” about it.
She will go to the polls in September against Social Democrat candidate Martin Schulz, the former European Parliament President.

Το Facebook θα κατασκοπεύει τα προσωπικά μηνύματα των χρηστών.

Το αφεντικό του Facebook, ο Mark Zuckerberg, φαίνεται πως   σχεδιάζει να χρησιμοποιήσει την τεχνητή νοημοσύνη για να λογοκρίνει και να κατασκοπεύει τους χρήστες
Ο ηγέτης των Κοινωνικών μέσων μαζικής ενημέρωσης φαίνεται να έχει κατά λάθος αποκαλύψει το σύστημα για την παρακολούθηση των «ιδιωτικών» επικοινωνιών

Ο Mark Zuckerberg φαίνεται να έχει «κατά λάθος» αποκαλύψει  τα σχέδια για τη χρήση τεχνητής νοημοσύνης για να κατασκοπεύει τα προσωπικά μηνύματα των χρηστών του Facebook », σε μια προσπάθεια για την καταπολέμηση της "τρομοκρατίας ".
Ο δισεκατομμυριούχος άφησε να εννοηθεί αυτό στο αμφιλεγόμενο σύστημα σε μια πρώιμη έκδοση ενός 6.000 λέξεων μανιφέστο για το μέλλον του Facebook.


Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg hints at SECRET plans to use artificial intelligence to censor and spy on users

Social media supremo appears to have accidentally revealed scheme to monitor 'private' communications

The billionaire hinted at this controversial scheme in an early version of a 6,000-word manifesto about Facebook’s future.
Zuckerberg’s wife Priscilla Chan and their tot Max inside their Silicon Valley home
Zuckerberg’s wife Priscilla Chan and their tot Max inside their Silicon Valley home
Mark Zuckerberg wears an Oculus Rift, a virtual reality helmet
Mark Zuckerberg wears an Oculus Rift, a virtual reality helmet
Once the final long document was released to the public, all mention of it seemed to have disappeared.
“The long term promise of AI is that in addition to identifying risks more quickly and accurately than would have already happened, it may also identify risks that nobody would have flagged at all including terrorists planning attacks using private channels, people bullying someone too afraid to report it themselves, and other issues both local and global,” he wrote on a version of the document given to Associated Press.
Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg posts video of his AI assistant Jarvis
Virtual slave

Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg posts video of his AI assistant Jarvis
But here's what the published version of the document said: "Looking ahead, one of our greatest opportunities to keep people safe is building artificial intelligence to understand more quickly and accurately what is happening across our community."
It added: "Going forward, there are even more cases where our community should be able to identify risks related to mental health, disease or crime."
Big Zucker sits at the helm of one of a social network which could easily be turned into one of the most powerful surveillance systems the world has ever seen.
Facebook users appear happy to hand over vast amounts of information about themselves to Zuck's social network and they are often too busy sharing selfies to realise their privacy is under threat.
Facebook is the world's largest social network and holds a HUGE amount of data on its users
Getty Images
Facebook is the world's largest social network and holds a HUGE amount of data on its users
His charitable body recently funded the development of a brain implant with the potential to record people's thoughts.
Although this is designed to help disabled people interact with prosthetic limbs, it set alarm bells ringing among paranoid people who believe technological progress will come at the expense of human freedom.
In his epic manifesto, he set out plans for world domination and vowed to abolish loneliness.
He wrote: "Our job at Facebook is to help people make the greatest positive impact while mitigating areas where technology and social media can contribute to divisiveness and isolation."
"Progress now requires humanity coming together not just as cities or nations, but also as a global community," he added.

Saturday, February 18, 2017

Όχι άλλο κάρβουνο.


Διαφήμηση για το i-bank Pay 4 Business και Γιαχβέ, το όνομα του Θεού .

 i-bank Pay 4 Business δύο γράμματα σε κάθε χέρι συνδυάζονται για να σχηματίσουν Γιαχβέ, το όνομα του Θεού, Shefa Tal, Hanau, 1612.

Πολιτισμική καταστροφή ο προσηλυτισμός των Μάγιας στον Χριστιανισμό.

Cultural destruction the proselytism of Mayans to Christianity.
Πολιτισμική καταστροφή ο προσηλυτισμός των Μάγιας στον Χριστιανισμό.

«Οι τεχνικές λατόμησης και η εξάπλωση του φημισμένου κατά την αρχαιότητα Πράσινου Θεσσαλικού Λίθου».

την Τρίτη 21 Φεβρουαρίου και ώρα 20.00,
θα πραγματοποιηθεί η διάλεξη του
Βασίλη Μέλφου,
Επίκουρου Καθηγητή του τμήματος Γεωλογίας του Α.Π.Θ. με θέμα:
«Οι τεχνικές λατόμησης και η εξάπλωση του φημισμένου κατά την αρχαιότητα Πράσινου Θεσσαλικού Λίθου».

Το Χόλιγουντ και τα Εταιρικά Μέσα κάνουν Σταυροφορία για να επιτραπεί η Παιδοφιλία.

Το Χόλυγουντ και τα Εταιρικά Μέσα κάνουν Σταυροφορία για να επιτραπεί η Παιδοφιλία
 Πολιτικός φιλόσοφος Νόαμ Τσόμσκι αναφέρθηκε κάποτε στα Εταιρικά Μέσα ενημέρωσης στις ΗΠΑ ως τη μεγαλύτερη και η πιο εξελιγμένη επιχείρηση προπαγάνδας στην ανθρώπινη ιστορία.
Η κύρια μέσα μαζικής ενημέρωσης, τα οποία ανήκουν σε μόλις έξι εταιρείες, κάνουν περισσότερα από όσα ακριβώς διαφημίζουν για τη φαρμακευτική βιομηχανία: επιχειρούν να διαμορφώσουν τις αξίες και τις αντιλήψεις μας.
Και τώρα αυτή η μηχανή προπαγάνδας και τα υποκατάστατα της προσπαθούν να κατασκευάσουν μια κοινωνία όπου η επιθυμία για βιασμό ή εκμετάλλευση   των παιδιών - κατ 'ευφημισμό ονομάζεται «παιδοφιλία» - νομιμοποιείται.
Ο λόγος που συμβαίνει αυτό, όπως θα δούμε παρακάτω, είναι ότι πολλοί από τα πιο ισχυρούς μεγιστάνες των μέσων ενημέρωσης και φωτιστικά Hollywood είναι οι ίδιοι παιδεραστές.
Ο Corey Feldman και ο Elijah Wood έχουν καταθέσει δημοσίως ότι η βιομηχανία των ειδήσεων και της ψυχαγωγίας είναι μολυσμένη με συμμορίες που βιάζουν παιδιά, παρομοιάζοντας τες με μια κοινωνία από «γύπες» που εκμεταλλεύονται τα θύματά τους.
Η προπαγάνδα κινείται σταδιακά σε τρία στάδια.
Κατ 'αρχάς, ο όρος «παιδοφιλία» χρησιμοποιείται ως ευφημισμός για ότι είναι, αντικειμενικά, δηλαδή την επιθυμία του βιασμού ή της εκμετάλλευσης παιδιών. Όταν το επαναπροσδιορίζουν ως «έλξη προς τους ανηλίκους»,  αυτό αποτελεί κατάχρηση της γλώσσας.
Δεύτερον, ένα παραπλανητικό το συμπέρασμα που γίνεται από την παραδοχή ότι η παιδεραστία είναι μια νευρολογική πάθηση για να καταλήξουν στο συμπέρασμα ότι η συμπάθεια και όχι ντροπή θα πρέπει να προορίζεται για τους άνδρες που θέλουν να βιάσουν ή να εκμεταλλευτούν παιδιά.
Τρίτον, με τα λάθη στο συλλογισμό και τη διφορούμενη γλώσσα, οι προπαγανδιστές προωθούν την ιδέα ότι η παιδεραστία θα πρέπει να γίνει αποδεκτή. Αυτό γίνεται κυρίως έμμεσα αφού προωθούν το θέμα ως «συζήτηση», υποστηρίζοντας αλλαγές πολιτικής, συγκρίνοντας τους παιδεραστές σε τις μειονότητες, ή κατηγορώντας όσους απορρίπτουν τους καταχραστές ως μισαλλοδόδοξους.
Ως παράδειγμα της προπαγάνδας των μέσων ενημέρωσης, η εφημερίδα New York Times δημοσίευσε ένα άρθρο, δηλώνοντας ότι η παιδεραστία "δεν είναι ένα έγκλημα" (Ναι, σαφέστατα αυτοί οι άνθρωποι δεν θέλουν τον Νόμο  να χτυπήσει την πόρτα τους.)

Hollywood and Corporate Media are Crusading to Normalize Pedophilia
Political philosopher Noam Chomsky once referred to the mainstream media in the US as the largest and most sophisticated propaganda operation in human history.
The mainstream media, which is owned by just six corporations, does more than just advertise for the pharmaceutical industry: it attempts to shape our values and perceptions.
And now this propaganda machine and its surrogates are attempting to engineer a society where the desire to rape or exploit children — euphemistically called “pedophilia” —  is normalized.
The reason this is happening, as we shall see below, is that many of the most powerful media moguls and Hollywood luminaries are themselves pedophiles.
Corey Feldman and Elijah Wood have testified publicly that the news and entertainment industry is infested by child rape rings, likening it to a society of “vultures” who prey on the vulnerable.
The propaganda is phased out incrementally in three stages.
First, the term ‘pedophilia’ is itself used as a euphemism for what is, objectively, a desire to rape or exploit children. When they redefine it as “attraction to minors,” that is an abuse of language.
Second, a fallacious inference is made from the assumption that pedophilia is a neurological condition to the conclusion that sympathy rather than shame ought to be reserved for men who want to rape or exploit children.
(There are many problems with this line of reasoning. It is simply false that the desire to rape or exploit children is a neurological condition over which one has no control. There is no extant body of independent, controlled, peer-reviewed scientific research that supports such a notion, which is why the propaganda peddlers must use loose pseudo-scientific weasel phrases like “studies suggest.” Moreover, it does not follow that men with the desire to rape or exploit children should not be morally blamed. Even if something were a neurological condition (which it isn’t, in this case), it does not vitiate one’s autonomy of thought and volition, and so it does not preclude negative moral evaluation.  But the worst problem is that by sympathizing with such men, it silences the real victims: the children. If someone has a desire to rape vulnerable victims but by sheer luck, or fear of prison, hasn’t acted on it yet, they should feel deep shame and thereby seek ways of correcting their moral deformity, rather than viewing themselves as a “victim” and demanding that society sympathize with them.)
Third, with the errors in reasoning and ambiguous language in place, the propagandists will float the idea that pedophilia ought to be accepted. This is done mostly implicitly by framing the issue as a “debate,” advocating policy changes, comparing pedophiles to minorities, or accusing those who reject the abusers of bigotry.
As an example of media propaganda, the New York Times published an op-ed declaring that pedophilia is “not a crime”  (Yes, quite clearly these people don’t want Johnny Law knocking on their door.)
The article is replete with pseudo-science, euphemisms, linguistic sleights of hand, and assertions without argument. For example, it characterizes pedophilia as a “disorder” that “these people [pedophiles] are living with.”
People who want to rape or exploit children, you see, are victims “living with” a condition that happened to them, as if they caught a cold. They have no choice. Of course this isn’t true, but again, even if it were, it doesn’t follow that it isn’t morally reprehensible.
The article inserts a soundbite about “recent studies” which “suggest” that the author’s opinion is correct. None of the studies are cited, of course, and instead readers must depend on the author’s vague interpretation of their results. Thus we are treated with claims like this: “Men with pedophilia are three times more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous, a finding that strongly suggests a neurological cause.”
The implicit idea is that men who want to rape or exploit children are suffering from an affliction, much like people diagnosed with cancer, and so the consequence (without always being stated) is that they are not subject to moral evaluation and shame but ought to be treated with compassion. The claim that pedophilia is a condition that “happens to” men rather than an internal conscious mental state involving attitudes and desires functions to remove moral blameworthiness.
Any mental activity, sexual or otherwise, can be broadly described with reference to neuroscientific phenomena — and citing vague neural activity as an excuse for actions is simply a fancier way of saying “the devil made me do it.” It is patently fallacious to assume that correlative neural activity precludes higher-order conscious states involving agency, desire, action, and volition.
The article is abundant in pseudo-science and an implicit 18th century brand of determinism, but one thing is sorely lacking: sympathy for the real victims of pedophiles. What kind of world are we living in when a New York Times op-ed devotes more space to apologetics for pedophiles than it does to defending the children themselves? How about we first rescue the children and then we can let pedo-apologists have a field day theorizing about the psyches of the abusers once they are quarantined from society? Or is that too “bigoted”?
Many will recall that the New York Times is the same fake news outlet that defended the illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003, which lead to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children, so it is unsurprising to see their publications once again defending ideas that enable violence toward children.
Interestingly, it was discovered that Mark Thompson, who is now the CEO of the New York Times, was caught lying in a cover-up of a case involving a child rapist named Jimmy Saville.
Jimmy Saville, for those who aren’t familiar, was a sadistic child rapist who would bite his victims, as well as rape corpses. As many as 500 children may have been victims, while media moguls and celebrities fawned over him and covered up his crimes.
When news broke recently of a major pedophile ring that was arrested in Norway, the New York Times and other corporate mainstream outlets deleted the reports of it.
Washington Post Deleted.
ABC Deleted .
NY Times Deleted.
And of course the Father of Fake News, CNN, has been found to promulgate views which implicitly express “sympathy” for child rapists or at least raise the possibility thereof. The goal is not so much to outright defend child exploitation — not yet, anyway — but to incrementally expose the population to its normalization. For this form of propaganda to work all that is required is that a framework is established within which it is no longer evil but rather an issue that is “up for debate.”
Salon has also tried to normalize pedophilia with articles like “I’m a pedophile, not a monster.” It features a fat middle-aged man named Todd Nickerson who describes how he “relieved himself in a bathroom” after encountering 5-yr-old child. He also refers to himself as a “virtuous” pedophile. The article enraged Americans.
 As the Free Thought Project reports:
In the current age of political correctness, some sects of society know no limits as to how far they will go to force acceptance to avoid offending others. In one extreme case of forcing such political correctness, Salon magazine implies that society must be accepting of pedophiles. In two separate articles, Salon refers to pedophilia as an ‘alternate sexual preference’ and suggests that society should embrace these differences by insinuating that this poor man is just misunderstood.
The article and video on Salon deal with pedophiles known as ‘non-offending’ — meaning while these individuals admit they are sexually attracted to prepubescent children, they claim they’ve never acted on it. However, the subject of one Salon article, Todd Nickerson admitted to seeking out jobs as a babysitter and noted that he “fell in love” with a five-year-old whom he babysat.
And then we have Hollywood. Here is Corey Feldmen explaining the problem of child rape in Hollywood:
Roman Palanski was convicted for drugging and raping a 13-yr-old child. Human beings are disgusted by this, but some celebrities were observed defending him, confirming the truism that Hollywood celebrity culture is essentially an outdoor mental asylum.
Antony Kidman was yet another celebrity mogul reported for brutal child rape. Why is it that we do not see anybody who worked with him speaking out about the issue?


Ο κίνδυνος του εξτρεμισμού

Ο κίνδυνος του εξτρεμισμού

Πόσες φορές έχουμε ακούσει από τους πολιτικούς του κατεστημένου και τα μέλη της λεγόμενης ελίτ ότι ένας από τους σοβαρότερους κινδύνους που αντιμετωπίζει η ανθρωπότητα σήμερα  είναι η "άνοδος του λαϊκισμού» ή «ακροδεξιού εξτρεμισμού»; Περισσότερες  από μία φορά θα μπορούσαμε,   τολμάμε να πούμε.

Αυτό που προσπαθούν να πετύχουν είναι προφανώς να τρομάξουν τους ανθρώπους στη σκέψη ότι αν δεν ακολουθήσουν τα σχέδιά τους και τα πολιτικά τους προγράμματα, ακόμα και αν δεν τους αρέσουν, θα   αντιμετωπίσουν την πιθανότητα της εμφάνισης  του «φασισμού» ή του «ναζισμού» και την άνοδο τους στην εξουσία και πάλι. Θέλουν να πιστεύουμε ότι αυτοί είναι η μόνη έγκυρη εναλλακτική λύση για την ελευθερία και τη δημοκρατία, η μόνη που μπορεί να υπερασπιστεί ανοικτά  την πολυπολιτισμική ανεκτική κοινωνία μας από την επιστροφή σε μια κολασμένη σκοτεινή εποχή κάτω από την λαϊκιστική κυριαρχία.

 The extremism danger

Ηow many times have we heard from establishment politicians and members of the so-called élite that one of the gravest dangers that humanity is facing at this point in time (apart from apocaliptic man-made climate change) is the “rise of populism” or “far-right extremism”? More than one could bear, we dare say.

What they’re trying to accomplish is obviously scare people into thinking that if they don’t go along with their plans and their political program, even if they don’t like it, they’re going to face the possibility of having “fascism” or “nazism” rise to power again. They’d like to have us think that they’re the only valid alternative for freedom and democracy, the only one that can defend our open and multi-cultural tolerant society from going back straight into a hellish dark age under populist rule.

So we’ve been told that there was no possibility that the British could fall for the complaints of a few uneducated peasants, fishermen and hillbillies misguided by some scammer half-politician, leader of an obscure party of bigots. Even less possibilities that a crazy orange clown could win the presidency of the United States of America, against such a magnificent champion of human rights and world peace. A bunch of gun-toting racist rednecks couldn’t possibly decide the fate of that great nation!

No, things didn’t turn out the way they wanted, and now they’re in big trouble all over western society. But after the initial shock, contingency measures are quickly been adopted. Internet censorship beign one of the priorities, but also international crisis and military tensions with Russia, the country that in their plans would have had to be portrayed as our “common enemy”, so that the people would be forced to accept more belt tightening, as if the impoverishment and the amount of taxes that we already have to be subjected to wasn’t enough.

Tell the truth: you never thought that the way to achieve globalized progress was to live the orwellian dream, didn’t you? People like Obama, Hillary Clinton and Angela Merkel, that has under her the whole European Union, are telling us that to achieve peace we need a war. War is peace. They’re telling us that we have to give up our rights and be surveilled and told what to do by the all seeing super-state. Freedom is slavery. They’re telling us that they will review the news and tell us what is real and what isn’t. Ignorance is strenght. As a bonus, poverty is richness, we might add. They want us to live under permanent austerity and reject the ugliness of making a little more money for ourselves.

If you wanted to look at some other options, in case you weren’t interested anymore in this kind of policies, well you can’t! The alternative is fascism and regression! Really? So what does the extremist opposition stand for, in general? Well, they’re not all the same of course, we have various movements that are opposed to the establishment: from Nigel Farage’s UK Independence Party, to Marine Le Pen’s Front Nationale in France, Geert Wilders’ Partij Voor de Vreiheid in the Netherlands and Frauke Petry’s Alternative für Deutschland in Germany and even the Swedish Democrats in Sweden. Some common points that they are making? National and economical sovereignty, opposition to anti-democratic EU, regulating immigration and border control, decreasing taxation, peace with Russia, starting with the lift on the economic sanctions imposed on her, and just maybe, avoid stirring up the middle east and getting involved in irresponsible military interventions. What does the current political class representing globalism and elitism stands for, again? Austerity and inhuman taxation, wars in God forsaken countries, permanent military crisis with Russia, internet censorship, people control and letting us be invaded by Islam, that has only one objective: imposing sharia law on the western world and eventually conquer it and kill and enslave the infidels.

Who are the extremists here?

Η «Μέθοδος Μπερλουσκόνι" για να απαλλαγούν από τον Trump.

Η «Μέθοδος Μπερλουσκόνι" για να απαλλαγούν από τον Trump.

 Ιταλική χερσόνησος, στις αρχές της δεκαετίας του '90. Μετά την πτώση της Σοβιετικής Ένωσης, το πιο ισχυρό κομμουνιστικό κόμμα στη Δύση άλλαξε όνομα και άρχισε το πρώτο πλήρους κλίμακας πραξικόπημα ενάντια σε αυτό που θεωρήθηκε ως  το  «Κατεστημένο» τη χρονική εκείνη στιγμή. Με το πρόσχημα της καταπολέμησης της διαφθοράς που δήθεν μαστίζει τα  πέντε κόμματα (Pentapartito), τον φιλο-δυτικό συνασπισμό που κυβερνούσε τη χώρα για περισσότερο από μια δεκαετία (που αποτελείται από Χριστιανοδημοκράτες, σοσιαλιστές διαφωνούντες, φιλελεύθερους, κοινωνικούς - Δημοκράτες, Ρεπουμπλικάνους), οι κομμουνιστές ενεργοποίησαν τους κοιμώμενους πράκτορες τους (sleeper agents) στο δικαστικό σύστημα και προσέλαβαν δικηγόρους, με την υπόσχεση μιας λαμπρής και γρήγορης μελλοντικής πολιτικής καριέρας να επιτεθούν με σκοπό να ρίξουν τους ανθρώπους που τους είχαν εμποδίσει να έρθουν στην εξουσία, όταν υπήρχε ακόμη η ΕΣΣΔ.

 Έτσι, το δικαστικό σώμα, με αρμοδιότητες στην πράξη ίδιες με εκείνες που είδαμε  από δικαστές στο "Judge Dredd" στο μετα-αποκαλυπτικό κόμικ», ξεκίνησαν τις μεγάλες δίκες παρωδία. Ο Φιντέλ Κάστρο θα ήταν τόσο περήφανος, και πιθανώς να ήταν, εκείνη την εποχή. Με την επιθετικότητα  των λυσσασμένων σκυλιών,   «προληπτικά» συνελήφθησαν και φυλακίστηκαν περισσότεροι από πέντε χιλιάδες άνθρωποι, οι περισσότεροι από τους οποίους δεν είχαν κάνει τίποτα. Το αποτέλεσμα ήταν 45 να αυτοκτονήσουν, και οι οικογένειες τους καταστράφηκαν  και έγιναν αναξιόπιστες. Και όσον αφορά τη διαφθορά; Τίποτα δεν άλλαξε. Αλλά αυτό δεν ήταν κάτι που τους πείραξε καθόλου. Ενήργησαν πολύ αποτελεσματικά και με επιτυχία, για να αφαιρέσουν   όλες σχεδόν τις σοβαρές αντιδράσεις, ενώ απόφευγαν τους κομμουνιστές και πέμπτη φάλαγγα  τους. Ναι, αυτοί ήταν οι καθαροί, οι αδιάφθοροι! Όσον αφορά τις κατηγορίες της παράνομης χρηματοδότησης από τη Μόσχα και τη συνεργασία με την KGB, τι ανοησία! Ήταν φιλο-αμερικανικά ψέματα της προπαγάνδας της CIA.

The "Berlusconi Method" to get rid of Trump

 Italian peninsula, early 90s. After the fall of the Soviet Union, the most powerful communist party in the West changed name and started its first full-scale coup against what was considered the "establishment" at the time. With the excuse of fighting the corruption that was supposedly rampant in the files of the five parties (Pentapartito), the pro-western coalition that had governed the country for more than a decade (comprised of christian-democrats, socialist dissidents, liberals, social-democrats, republicans), the communists activated their sleeper agents in the judicial system and recruited attorneys with the promise of a brilliant and quick future political career to be unleashed with the purpose of bringing down the people that had prevented them to come to power when the USSR still existed.

So the judiciary, with powers practically equal to those held by Judges in the "Judge Dredd" comics' post-apocalyptic society, started the great farce trials. Fidel Castro would have been so proud, and he probably was, at the time. With the aggressivness of rabid dogs, they "preemptively" arrested and jailed more than five thousand people, most of whom didn't have anything to do with anything. The result was 45 people that committed suiced, and families ruined and discredited. And regarding corruption? Nothing changed. But that wasn't what mattered at all. They acted very efficiently and succesfully, for they removed almost all serious opposition, while clearing the communists and their fifth columns. Yes, they were the pure ones, the uncorruptibles! Regardless of the accusations of illegal funding from Moscow and collaboration with the KGB, what nonsense! Probably just pro-american CIA lying propaganda.

And that's how the "first republic" ended. The way was cleared by the judicial system to the communist power grab, finally, now that the "red danger" was supposedly over, and wasn't perceived as a threat anymore. With the 1994 elections approaching, the globalist "joyful war machine" led by communist hard-liner Achille Occhetto was portrayed as the only political force that could open up the new "progressive" era...if it wasn't for one damned outsider: Silvio Berlusconi. The controversial entrepeneur from Milan, one of the richest people in the world, decided to get into politics, as he stated, to "counter the communist menace" that according to him was still present, and rightly so, we might add. All hell broke loose among the leftists and the élite. Lower taxes? Less regulation? Free market? Wait a minute, what?! An entrepeneur couldn't possibly be a politician! Say something, sign petitions! But they were taken by surprise and they lost those historic elections by quiet a margin. And all went on to live happily ever after.....or maybe not. Remeber the politicized judicial system? Here we go. The left's main weapon was ready to deliver a blow to the new administration, not even three years in office, and an indictment by the almighty judges sufficed to lead to a crisis of governemnt, with the help of pro-left complacent president of the republic, Oscar Luigi Scalfaro. What followed was an absolute obscure era, where we were taxed to the marrow to join the EU and to be among the first to enter the new criminal common currency, the Euro, thanks to globalist former christian democrat professional scammer Romano Prodi (also good friend of our dear George Soros), the prime minister in those terrible times. After that, there was a series of "technical governments" (unelected), one worst than the other. In the meantime, Berlusconi was at the opposition and still under various investigations regarding his businessess, but actually never fuond guilty. Come 2001 and after all the taxations and regulation, surprise surprise!, Berlusconi won again presenting an economical classical liberal program. The opposition was still fierce and foaming at the mouth. Protest after protest, riot after riot, investigation after investigation, on himself, on his family, students occupying schools etc., the left hammered on with everything they've got, that is a lot, apart from the popular vote. Psuedo-intellectuals, sports and tv celebrities, always spuoting leftist propaganda and personal attacks on the prime minister; singers making songs against Berlusconi, writers writing stories fantasizing about him being assassinated and even kidnapped and sadistically tortured! I remember those times, beign in school in a far-leftist enclave, it was just crazy! And now I see that happening again. On the other side of the Atlantic, in the US! What the deep state, the élite and the pseudo-intellectuals and useless celebrities are doing under the guidance of the globalists is pretty much the same. They too are also using the judiciary to sabotage president Trump, and even globalist operatives inside the intelligence community.

Now to be clear, I'm not really comparing Trump to Berlusconi, they are two different people and have also different programs. In this recent period Berlusconi became, under we believe both blackmail and political opportunity, a globalist and an EU shill, unfortunately (plus, he's always been kind of a cuckservative, if you ask me), but some similarities can indeed be made. The people that voted them were the disinfranchised, the ones left out by the élites "progressive" policies, that means small businesses, small entrepeneurs and even workers and public sector low level employees. The methods wich have been succesful more than once to remove the italian PM from power (judiciary, false propaganda, personal attacks) are been used right now to demonize and to sabotage Trump. And don't forget internal sabotage, that was also key, as we'll see as we conclude the "story".

So in 2006, the left, after all the smearing campaign (bear this in mind...) succeeded in winning again at the general elections, but just barely and with more than a suspect of voter fraud. According to our system, if a governemnt in charge looses the majority of consensus in parliament, a new governemnt must be made (in theory through elections, but it seems that nowadays they like to use "technical governemnts", elections are for losers, right?). The left couldn't hold it, and lost soundly once again in 2008 to Berlusconi and the center-right coalition. This time they even played the sex card, and the accusation was that of having had sex with minors at private parties, an accusation that was never proven, even though the guy liked chicks, maybe too much, but that's another issue. Anyway, his majority in parliament was sound, that was not the problem. The problem was that he started making statemetns and remarks that were not exactly kind towards Angela Merkel, the german (and european) boss, and the Euro. Was he a jerk to Merkel? Yes? Good! But according to intercepted conversations he supposedly also accosted foreign leaders at various meetings, to start negotiations to leave the Euro. And that was it. He needed to go, possibly once and for all. President of the republic, communist Giorgio Napolitano, didn't waste time in starting conspiring (yes, conspiring) with Merkel and European Central Bank director Mario Draghi, to force Berlusconi to resign, thus committing high treason against the institutions. With Merkel and the élite's blessing, the then prime minister, elected by the people through the democratic process, was ousted, just like that. From his allies and his entourage, no support, no one stood against the act of treason committed in violation of the constitution by traitorous president Napolitano. Some even had an active part in pulling the rag from under Berlusconi's feet, like former deputy PM Gianfranco Fini (now in trouble for money laundering), as well as other "allies". He himself was silent, due to judiciary blackmail regarding his businesses (put up or we shut you and your family down). Absolute globalist Mario Monti was nominated PM and our real taste of technocracy began. Fake elections were held in 2013, but the elected PM (of course, he was from the left) resigned immediately afterwards, and so on we went to this day with unelected governments. As I said, now Berlusconi is shilling for the EU, the Euro and the current government, he's not heading a revolutionary force like he had in 1994 anymore. His party in Europe is voting for all the free trade agreements imaginable and defending the globalist program.

 In my opinion Trump needs to look at this part of italian political history and learn from it. As said, the two characters are quiet different, Trump seems to be the actual real deal, for once, but I believe that many circumstances are similar: the antagonistic propaganda, the hatred, the sabotage can happen and are happening in pretty much the same way in America right now. Beware!

Αυτά τα 17 τρόφιμα είναι απαγορευμένα. Εσύ τα τρώς;

Αυτά τα 17 τρόφιμα είναι απαγορευμένα στις άλλες χώρες, όμως, οι Αμερικανοί εξακολουθούν να τα τρώνε.

  Όλα αυτά τα 17 τρόφιμα που βρέθηκαν σε προϊόντα διατροφής είναι απαγορευμένα σε άλλες ανεπτυγμένες χώρες, αλλά οι Αμερικανοί τα διατηρούν το φαγητό τους, επειδή δεν γνωρίζουν τους κινδύνους  που ενέχουν για την υγεία.


These 17 Foods are Banned By Other Countries, Yet Americans are Still Eating Them

 All 17 of these items found in food products are banned in other developed nations, but Americans keep eating them because they don’t know the health risks.

Brianna Acuesta | True Activist

If major foods are banned in other developed nations because of serious health risks, why is it that America has yet to ban them as well?

The answer is likely that those products are made by huge corporations who donate large sums of money to Congressmen and women who then turn around and crush bills that suggest banning the products.

So much for democracy.

 The alternative option Americans have for avoiding dangerous food products is by educating themselves and banning those products from their own diet. They can also inform their friends and family so that maybe, someday, enough people will refuse to consume the product and the corporations will have to make a change.

It’s a shame that it has come to this and that America’s system of democracy has been so obscured by money in politics that the health of our nation’s citizens is in the balance, but it’s important to make personal changes in your own life before you can effect change in everyone else’s.

Here’s a list of 17 foods that are banned by several nations worldwide and that Americans should cut from their diet.


 On top of these health risks, farm-raised salmon are also very bad for the environment. Seals, sea lions, and birds often get trapped in the nets around the salmon farms and drown. The pellets used to feed these salmon use more fish than are produced in these farms, making this practice highly unsustainable. The farms also cause huge declines in wild salmon populations, which is bad news for coastal ecosystems.


 You can avoid purchasing GMO papayas by buying the certified organic variety. You should also avoid papayas from Hawaii because of the possibility of cross-contamination, and instead purchase ones from Asia, Brazil, Belize, or Mexico. Varieties of non-GMO papayas include Kapoho, Mexican Red, Caribbean Red, Maradol, Royal Star, Singapore Pink, and Higgins papayas. Common GMO papayas are Rainbow, Sun Up, Strawberry, and Sunrise papayas.


Besides these obvious health risks, all three of these livestock animals are a part of the factory farming industry and suffer from intense cruelty from their birth until death. Pigs live in gestation crates where they can’t move around at all and wind up chewing the bars until they injure themselves because these smart creatures cannot handle being so immobile. Cows also live terrible lives and are exploited for their milk and for breeding purposes. If they somehow reach the slaughterhouse after the exhausting journey there without food or water, they are then stunned and chopped up alive. Chickens are arguably the most mistreated, as chickens bred for meat are given hormones to grow larger than normal, which causes their legs to break. Chickens bred to lay eggs have their beak cut off to prevent them from pecking each other since they are crammed together in unlivable conditions. All of these chickens are then ground up or boiled alive or suffocated in bags. .


The entire European Union (and Japan) have banned BVO in food products and America is still dragging its feet…


I know we’re all sad to see these awesome snacks and meals be contaminated with processed food dyes, but the dangers of these dyes are no joke. Read this True Activist article on the yellow food dye in Mac and Cheese. Jell-O, which is gelatin, is also made from the ground-up bones and tissue leftover from slaughtered animals, while the red coloring comes from ground-up bugs.


Again with the entire European Union… Come on, America. Plus it’s arsenic-laced chicken. This is one of those times when Americans would really be opposed to this, but they aren’t educated on the issue.


You can avoid this harmful ingredient by first checking the ingredients list when buying bread. It’s not a necessary ingredient, and as you can see, dozens of nations have banned it themselves.


Weight gain and vitamin depletion is hardly what those who are buying fat-free snacks are looking for.


The risks associated with eating these preservatives in foods make a good case for why people should be eating more fresh food, which are healthier for humans anyway.


As stated earlier, cattle are also treated extremely inhumanely even as dairy cows and consumers should consider this, along with the health risks of drinking or eating dairy products from cows injected with rBGH.


Not only does pink slime look disgusting, but it’s very unhealthy for you when you happen to consume a lot of ground beef with pink slime in it. If you want to know if you’re eating pink slime, look at the ingredients and see if “textured beef” or “finely textured beef” is on the list. If it is, then avoid those products.


Carrageenans are also used as vegan alternatives for gelatin and are in random products that you wouldn’t suspect, such as chocolate milk. It is not digestible and is often found in organic or “natural” products.


Research suggests that atrazine also can cause disruption in a person’s endocrine system by altering levels of key hormones and has led to an increased risk of breast and prostate cancer. It’s important for pregnant women to avoid exposure in an effort to ensure that their baby is born healthy and not adversely affected later in life.


This reckless use of chemicals is not just a risk because of the exposure to the chlorine by poultry workers and consumers; the use of these chemicals is done as an end-of-production “solution” to having bad hygiene and engaging in inhumane practices regarding their chickens during rearing and slaughter. It would be safer and more efficient for poultry facilities to fight bacteria at each stage of animal farming, rather than attempting to douse the already-infected animal in chemicals.


When flour is bleached in this speedy process, it also creates a byproduct called alloxan. Alloxan is used in labs to give healthy lab rats diabetes for experiments and the FDA still allows the processes that produce alloxan in flour to be used in food. Bleaching flour also significantly reduces the number of nutrients found in flour, such as calcium, iron, and B vitamins.


he free radicals in irradiated foods is truly cause for concern. While the free radicals are able to kill some bacteria to make food safer, they also bounce around and destroy vitamins and enzymes. With fewer enzymes, the body also has to work harder to digest the foods.


To avoid phosphate additives in your food, it’s best to shop at markets that sell more wholesome foods, rather than budget markets and multipurpose mega centers. These additives are more likely to be injected into products from big industries, which gives you a good reason to simply ditch junk food altogether.